|
Feature Article*
Changes in National Electric Code
Regarding
Abandoned Cabling
By
Gerard L. Lederer, Esq., Miller & Van Eaton
Part 1 -- THE CHALLENGE
The wires tenants have left behind in your
raised floors, walls and ceilings, as well as the cables abandoned by
carriers in your risers, have always been a nuisance. Due to changes in
the 2002 edition of the National Electric Code (“NEC”), those same wires
may now render your property out of code and jeopardize your property’s
fire insurance. This article examines the new rules that make it a
violation to have abandoned wires in your building’s risers or plenums
and mandate the use of specific wiring that meets certain
flame-retardant standards. It will also offer suggestions on a step-by-
step process to ensure that your office building, MDU, school, hospital
or other facility meets code, and that the financial impact of such
actions are borne by the appropriate party.
1. The NEC Process
The National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA), the national association of your local fire
inspector and Chief, is the secretariat of the NEC. The NFPA updates
the NEC every two to three years to ensure that the electrical code is
meeting real world challenges. Many of the national real estate
organizations such as the American Institute of Architects, the Building
Owners and Managers Association (BOMA), the National Multi-Housing
Association, and National Association of Home Builders are active in the
NEC drafting committees of the NFPA. And while the NEC, itself, does
not have the authority of law, almost every jurisdiction in the United
States adopts the NEC by reference in its building and fire codes.
Bottom line: you need to be aware of and endeavor to comply with the NEC
to the best of your ability.
While the rules
mandating the use of specific fire safe cable types and banning
abandoned wires in risers and plenums were adopted in late 2002, the
debate has been on going for years. The new rules in a great many ways
are a compromise between those who wanted to ban any wires not in metal
raceways (for fear that such wires promote the spread of fires), and
those that felt such deployments were perfectly safe.
2.
The Treatment of Plenum Wiring
The 2002 edition of the NEC is amended in at least nine locations
to explicitly permit the deployment of specific types of wires
(telephone, fiber, cable, fire alarm, power – see table below) in risers
and plenums without the requirement of a metal raceway or conduit. Each
section also includes the requirement that “Abandoned cables shall not
be permitted to remain unless contained in metal raceways.” Abandoned wires are defined almost uniformly as “Installed
communications cable that is not terminated at
both ends at a connector or other equipment and not identified for
future use with a tag.”
3.
Wires Covered by Rules
The below identified articles in the NEC permits the plenum installations
of the following types of wires, so long as it is an identified
fire-safe cable and the cable is not “abandoned.”
ARTICLE
TYPE OF WIRE
640
Audio Speaker Wires
645
Information Technology
725
Power-Limited Circuits
760
Fire Alarm Systems
770
Optical Fiber Cables
800
Communications Circuits
810
Radio, Television or Satellite
820
Coaxial (CATV)
830
Network-Powered Broadband
4. Wires Required
As referenced above, the NEC not only mandates the removal of wires from
plenum areas that are not in use and not tagged for future use, but also
mandates the specific type of fire safe cabling for each purpose.
(For more information about the types of wires, please refer to the NEC
articles listed above. Because this is not intended to be a
engineering paper, we raise the issue only so that the reader will
understand why it is imperative that certain steps in the response
proposal are incorporated, and why you skip such steps at your own
peril).
--------------------------------------------------------
Part 2 --
THE OWNER'S RESPONSE
I. Conduct a Riser and Plenum Cabling Audit
Regardless of who installed the cabling within your plenums and
risers, the building owner will ultimately be held responsible for
compliance with the NEC. Building owners or managers, therefore, need
to know the status of abandoned wire in their building(s) before the
fire marshal or insurance adjuster comes calling. Please do not take
this threat lightly, as there are cabling contractors already marketing
their services to insurance companies and underwriters to determine if
properties are in compliance with the new NEC. In fact, a national
magazine for the cabling industry described the new NEC as the “double
employment act” -- “We’ll get paid to install the wires and then again
to remove them.”
A comprehensive cabling audit should determine the following:
1. Are there wires in the risers or
plenums that are not being used?
(If the answer is “no,” either your building is brand new and has never
had a tenant turnover or a deal with a
failed carrier, or your need a
new building engineer, because they did a poor job of looking).
2. If there are wires in the
risers or plenums that are not being used, you need to determine:
What type of wires are they and/or
what service did they provide?
What brand and model is the cable?
This many times may be ascertained by the color of the wrap and
identification markings on the cable.
3. Once you learn what type of
abandoned cable you have, refer to the appropriate NEC section to
determine if
the cable is a permitted type.
4. If the abandoned cabling is a
permitted cable type, your engineers or consultants can tag those wires
for
future use and avoid the NEC requirement for removal.
5.
If the abandoned
cabling is not a permitted cable type it must be removed. (It may
be worth an investigation
as to what party deployed the wires to seek
recovery of the funds spent for removal and disposal of the
wires.)
6. Building Owners might
also consider pursuing policy changes to hold responsible the carrier
that deployed
the wiring, since under current law cable and telephone
carriers are free to abandon the wires in place.
II. Amend Lease / Condo Rules
/ Internal Operating Procedures
Building engineers confirm that tenants increasingly abandon
rather than remove phone and network wiring. In some cases, the
occupants abandon numerous generations of network wires, as faster
network speeds and newer cabling technology have required deployment of
enhanced cabling. Because the NEC no longer permits such wire storage
in plenums, building owners and facility managers must institute removal
procedures for such wiring, or they run the risk of bearing all the
expense of removal -- or worse: violating local fire codes and the
potential loss of fire insurance.
Here is some suggested language for amending new Commercial Leases and/or Residential
Rules:
CABLING ADDENDUM
1.
"The parties to this
agreement acknowledge that there are no abandoned wires, as defined by
the
National Electric Code (NEC), within the demised premises at the
commencement of the term of this agreement;" and
2.
"Tenant/Occupant agrees
that any cabling installed during the tenancy shall meet the
requirements of
the NEC and other national applicable fire and safety
codes;" and
·
"Tenant/Occupant agrees
to remove all wiring installed during the tenancy, unless excused in
writing by
the owner (management); or to forfeit such sums from the
security deposit (or by judgment if insufficient
funds exist in the
security deposit), for the removal and disposal of any such wires."
·
Aggressive Option –
"Tenant/Occupant shall supplement the security deposit required in this
Agreement
by fifty cents per linear foot of cabling deployed during the
duration of the term of the Agreement. The
terms of treatment of such
additional funds shall be governed by the terms of the security deposit.
III.
Existing Tenants
Leases and/or residential rules of conduct
with existing occupants are more complex as you must first find a legal
basis for amending the agreement. Most leases provide such options, as
they require tenants/occupants to comply with all applicable codes and
regulations. A suggested course of action with existing clients might
include the following:
1.
Review your existing
lease to ensure that it mandates that all actions taken by the tenant
during the term of the lease will comply with all local codes and
standards.
2.
Determine when your
local or state jurisdiction adopts the 2002 edition of the NEC.
3.
Communicate to the
tenant their responsibility to maintain the demised premises code
compliant by not deploy any wiring in the plenum that does not meet the
cabling categories identified by the NEC and not to abandon any wiring
within the demised premised during the term of the tenancy.
IV.
Amend Your Access
License Agreements
Tenants are not the only parties who
install cables within your premises which may trigger NEC review.
Telephone companies, cable providers, satellite or fixed wireless
providers, rooftop occupants (such as paging and cellular companies),
and fire and security alarm companies have all installed wires in your
building. Many have done so pursuant to a negotiated access
license agreement, other have accessed your property under tariff or
simple need.
If you have employed the “Model Access Agreement” developed by the Real
Access Alliance or the sample license agreement contained in the BOMA/NAA
book “Wired for Profit”, you may have some protection,
since these agreements require the carrier to comply with all applicable
laws and regulations, as well as removing wires at the termination of
the contract. Neither of those model documents, however, required any
kind of escrow to cover the removal of abandoned wires. Even if they
had, recovery such sums may be difficult since many of the parties that
executed such agreements went bankrupt or are otherwise no longer in
business.
Nonetheless, before executing any
new access agreements, ensure that the document explicitly references
the NEC, and investigate whether you can obtain a bond or letter of
credit to cover the expense of removing abandoned wires should the
carrier fail to do so.
About the Author:
Gerry Lederer
of Miller & Van Eaton is one of the nation's leading voices on the
integration of telecommunications technology into traditional workspace. Lederer has authored numerous texts on tenant needs and
telecommunications. Most of his research and writing was done as BOMA
International’s Research and Advocacy Division head.
Miller & Van Eaton, P.L.L.C.
MVE is
a law firm that offers specialized services in telecommunications.
Clients rely on Miller & Van Eaton for counsel and legal representation
on a wide range of business and regulatory matters that relate to every
communications industry: cable television, broadcasting, telephony,
wireless communications, and other telecommunications entities.
*CRE Partners is not responsible for the content, validity,
technical accuracy or other claims or information contained in this
article. Feature Articles are often authored by outside sources
and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of CRE Partners.
Further, publication of articles in the CRE Partners Newsletter and/or
web site is not meant to represent, promote, or endorse any company,
brand, product or solution.
|